I received a letter from a Shona Drummond, who seemingly works for Power Systems - which incidentally is a branch of Scottish Power; not a separate company as I was lead to believe. She has requested a rough guide to our power usage, to determine if an upgraded fuse is required at the cable head. She has also requested the same information from our next door neighbour at 108.
I contacted her by telephone just to let her know that all four properties in our block are connected through the one central cable head. Again, she was under the impression that only two of the four properties were connected at this cable head. Does this not strike anyone as odd? The fact that members of the same company, looking at presumably the same plans, cannot agree on whether a cable head supplies two or four properties. Does that not constitute a problem in itself?
I can assure anyone working at Power systems that; when the power was switched off at number 108 to repair what Frank says, was a burning fuse at 106, our power at 110 definitely went off too. Unfortunately I do not know about the power at 112. However, as three of the four properties in the block were definitely switched off, and Paul Sweeney and Frank of Power Systems said all four properties were linked, I'd say its safe to assume that the power at 112 was off too.
Incidentally the electricians who came to repair the fuse could not tell who the burning fuse belonged to so switched the power to all the properties off. So how then was Frank adamant that the burning fuse was not ours, but indeed belonged to 106?
